| "Complacency
is easily the biggest problem in corporate computer
security today," says Michael Gazelely, the chairman
of Network Box, a Hong Kong-based company that sells
network security solutions worldwide.
"If management does not clearly
identify security as a priority," he continues,
"the IT manager is not likely to make it one of
his priorities either. It then becomes a 'time-bomb'
which can go off at any moment. In the world today,
the Internet gateway is a primary business interface,
yet despite these soaring levels of Internet use - especially
for commercial transactions - the level of care, attention,
and reporting on security matters within most companies
is almost non-existent," he says.
Gazeley puts much of the blame for
this situation on the shoulders of the media. Far too
often, he says, the media will get excited about a single
virus or worm on the Internet, or a high-profile hacker
attack, and then roll out the old clichés about keeping
your anti-virus software up to date - and that's as
far as it goes. They do not look at the underlying problems
in any meaningful way; nor do they look at a bigger
picture of the situation; nor do they adequately emphasize
to the business community or the public the serious
consequences of not being properly protected. "Protection
needs to be comprehensive, properly configured, fully
updated in real-time, expertly managed and carefully
monitored," he adds.
The enemy within
Although security experts agree that
the threats posed by hackers, viruses and worms are
a major concern for any business, most feel that other
threats, seemingly more mundane but with the potential
to be even more damaging, are being unwisely neglected.
To strengthen their arguments they have begun to emphasize
two major types of risk: external and internal. There
are obviously threats from outside the company, but
there can also be serious threats from within.
"Threats are everywhere,"
says Thomas Parenty, who has been in the security business
for over 20 years, and is mainly concerned with what
happens "inside the firewall" - that is, the
security risk a company faces from its own staff.
"But
the weakest link in a corporate security network is
the link that is forgotten," he continues. "The
saying 'out of sight, out of mind' definitely applies
here. When we concentrate so much on one thing - anti-virus,
for example, which gets a lot of media attention - we
tend to miss a host of other problems. Few companies
perform any kind of security audit that would find vulnerabilities.
Instead, most seem happy to do nothing about internal
security until they are actually attacked, and then
it is often too late."
Parenty stresses the need for complete
solutions that take into account both types of threat.
Without that comprehensive approach, the amount spent
on security won't necessarily provide the required results
- and companies with multi-million-dollar budgets are
just as likely to "get it wrong" as smaller
ones. He cites the example of one company that did almost
everything right, and then sent all its most important
data to India un-encrypted to be handled by another
company it hardly knew. It came back un-encrypted as
well. "They were just lucky that nobody made a
copy while everything was so vulnerable," he says.
"Though of course somebody may have done just that
and no one knows about it yet."
The comprehensive plan
Security experts also emphasize that
not only should security systems take into account the
two main types of risk, security should be an integral
part of the planning of any computer set-up or system,
large or small.
"Security should be built into
a system from the beginning, not added on later,"
says Welland Chu, the Asian Regional Business Manager
for Thales E-Security, an Anglo-French technology company
that specialises in security for both civil and military
customers.
"By using a comprehensive approach
that incorporates both technological and human factors,"
he continues, "an organisation can effectively
protect itself from both the outside threats and the
threat posed by the disaffected insider. Security safeguard
measures should be incorporated into the IT systems
with full accountability maintained and logged from
network level right down to the individual level,"
he said.
"Design of the security system
is also vital," Chu continues. "A good security
design means user interference will be kept minimal
so that normal business operations are not impacted.
Computer security consultants can help companies plan
and deploy comprehensive systems that fit in with their
day-to-day business operations yet offer high security
that mitigates the various risks," Chu said.
The security conundrum
Whereas
the concept of combining ease of use with maximum security
is the ideal, achieving it is not so simple - especially
when financial transactions are involved. Every newspaper
story of Internet fraud, online credit card scams and
successful hacker attacks creates a demand for stronger
protection - even if that does mean the end user must
endure a little more inconvenience. Both online vendors
and buyers seem willing to accept this. Some of the
most effective new technologies being developed don't
quite fit into a minimalist, business-and-user-friendly
model - but they offer appealing end results.
Authentify, a US company specializing
in computer security systems, recently won a number
of awards for security solutions for online financial
transactions, and these give a good indication of current
thinking and possible developments in the near future.
Authentify uses a number of technologies, including
voice recognition and a secure "call back"
system using a telephone number the payee provides at
the time of the transaction.
"We offer a multi-factor authentication
solution," says Robert Soden, the Managing Director
for Authentify in Asia Pacific. "There are three
elements to identifying someone securely," he says,
"and by employing these three elements we can offer
a very high level of security in any transaction. First
there must be 'something you know', namely your user
account information. Then there is 'something you have',
the ability to answer a specific telephone number that
only you provide. Then there's 'something you are' and
for this we use voice biometrics. If any one of these
three can't be suitably confirmed, the transaction doesn't
go through."
The human factor
No doubt internal security issues will
also increasingly use multi-factor access protection,
but others still seek simpler solutions - or just a
broader approach to the problem. Paul Bonny, Vice President
and International Security Leader for the Security Services
Department of Wachovia Bank, believes the staff themselves
are the key. Although he doesn't deny the usefulness
of cameras, guards, and new technology, he believes
it ultimately comes down to creating an environment
of trust within a company.
"People are resourceful,"
he says, "and anyone with the wrong intentions
will always be looking for ways to get round whatever
technology or system you may deploy to watch them. If
they are resourceful and creative, they can get round
most anything," he said.
But most internal theft and fraud,
he says, is not discovered by auditors or even the police:
it is discovered and revealed by colleagues.
"If you create a family of policies,"
he says "including a code of conduct - and do not
assume everybody 'knows' what to do - you stand a better
chance of eliminating crime. It is also important to
protect whistle-blowers - and also important to have
a system in place that allows you to be quite careful
about checking on the reports you may get from them
as well. After all, not every whistle-blower is honest
himself."
As IT usage and e-commerce develops,
and computer crimes become more prevalent, security
will continue to be a major concern, an integral part
of business and a constantly evolving field. The security
systems developers keep coming up with better products
and methods, but right now it seems it is up to the
end-users in the business world to do more. IT security
should now be a major concern and an ongoing part of
every business. |