|
Investments
in China rose 26.7 percent in 2003, the largest single
increase in a decade. The surge prompted Premier Wen
and the Central Bank to raise their concerns about China's
economy overheating. Fixed asset investments in the
Mainland grew by 43 percent in the first quarter of
2003, while the growth in M2 monetary supply remained
high at around 20 percent. The CPI, which has risen
for six consecutive months, increased by 2.8 percent
during the same period, indicating China is in a period
of inflation.
Overheating
China's economy is like a train hurtling down the tracks
at full steam. With every unexpected turn, or pitfall
to a market economy, this locomotive risks derailing.
The Central Government warned of possible overheating
in the economy last year and pushed the alarm bell to
try and slow things down, with little effect. This has
raised worries that China might again slam on the "brakes"
to slow the economy. The last time it did this, 1994-1996,
investments screeched to a halt and interest rates hovered
in the double-digits. The con-sequences of this can
still be seen today as half-finished buildings stand
in cities around the country like tombstones of the
companies that fell in the crash. It also serves to
remind the authorities how difficult it is to exercise
macro economic adjustments.
The 9.9 percent growth in China's GDP for the first
quarter last year signalled the economy was overheating,
even though it slowed slightly during the outbreak of
SARS in the second quarter. At the end of 2003, the
Central Government was acutely aware that some industries,
especially iron and steel, electrolytic aluminium and
cement, were being over-invested in. For the first quarter
of 2004, the situation worsened with new investments
in these three industries doubling those for the same
period last year.
Two possible reasons for this over-investment are that
the market has high hopes that prices will keep rising,
and that most of these investments are by irrational
investors, or local governments. As the market is self-regulatory,
market expectation is unlikely to be the culprit. But
if speculators and local governments are stoking this
furnace, then the consequences could be disastrous.
According to surveys conducted by Mainland authorities,
the lion's share of these investments are owned by the
state, while those owned by private enterprises have
been offered preferential land and taxation treatment
by local governments. Such practices will result in
investors defaulting on their loans in the not too distant
future. This tells us that the government's tinkering
with the economy has done more harm than good and illustrates
just how far China has yet to go before it can step
out of the shadow of a planned economy.
Macro control
In mid-2003, when China's economy was in deflation,
the Central Bank noticed that the economy was prone
to overheating as a result of the rapid growth of M2
supply. As such, it raised banks deposit reserve rate
by one percentage point to adjust for this. Six months
later, both the CPI and M2 supply showed no sign of
slowing down. In March this year, the Central Bank further
increased the deposit reserve rate of private commercial
banks by 0.5 percent. In April, the four major state-owned
commercial banks followed suit.
Since 1997, China has been implementing an active fiscal
policy and the stimulus that this is having on the economy
is obvious. Recently, it also tightened the issuance
of treasury bonds to 110 billion yuan this year, down
30 billion yuan from the previous year.
With regards to China's monetary policy, the renminbi/US
dollar peg has considerably undermined its initiative
in using monetary measures as a means of macro economic
control. Hong Kong claims not to have any monetary policy
because of the linked exchange rate regime and the free
flow of capital. Although China's capital account has
yet to become fully convertible, its operating account
is actually open. This means that China's capital, despite
not being able to move as freely as that of Hong Kong's,
enjoys high mobility. Given this scenario, it is risky
for China to raise its interest rates, especially now
that the interest rate for renminbi is higher than that
for the US dollar. Conversely, it is easier for China
to exercise macro economic control through raising banks
deposit reserve rates. This would have minimal impact
on investment sentiment as the interest rates for the
yuan would remain unchanged.
Tightening investment approval procedures would also
enhance macro economic control, but its success would
depend on the cooperation of local governments. Yet,
when local governments are investors of many key projects
across the country, following such a policy would be
against their own interests.
If economic indicators -- including investments, the
CPI and M2 supply -- show no signs of improving in the
months ahead, China may resort to raising interest rates.
The Central Bank said it will consider increasing interest
rates across the board when those for loans become negative
numbers and inflation exceeds 5 percent. Room also exists
for China to do so after the U.S. raises its interest
rates.
All in all, no matter what macro control measures the
Chinese government adopts, the ultimate goal is to ensure
stable and continual growth of the Mainland economy.
Inflation on the Mainland has a limited impact on Hong
Kong's economy, because Chinese imports account for
a very small proportion of Hong Kong's CPI. However,
whether China can maintain stable economic development,
obviously, is a critical issue for Hong Kong.
Trade with China accounts for 20 percent of Hong Kong's
GDP and our economy would be badly hit by any reduction
in China's foreign trade. Since China opened up to investment
over 20 years ago, the country has been quick to learn
and has made incredible progress in such a short time.
As the Central Bank started to take precautions to prevent
the economy from overheating since mid-2003, this writer
believes the Chinese Government will not allow the hard
economic landing that we experienced in 1994-96 to repeat
itself.
|