It is now June 2005, the sixth month of the post-quota
era. However, 2005 is beginning to feel like 2004 and other
years past from a textile and quota perspective. The reason
of course is the textile safeguard, which picked up steam
in May 2005 when the US slapped new safeguards through the
end of the year on Categories 301, 338/339, 340/640, 347/348,
352/652, 638/639 and 647/648. More safeguards are expected
to be imposed later this month or next month. While the
end result may not be a comprehensive quota system, it’s
beginning to feel a lot like the past, especially for Hong
Kong.
It is reasonable
to expect that Hong Kong’s production for the balance
of 2005 in the safeguard categories will increase as companies
re-source goods away from China to Hong Kong in these categories.
How much of an increase is anybody’s guess. Similar
re-sourcing increases will occur in other jurisdictions,
such as Macau. Whatever the increase is will be looked upon
with some skepticism by US Customs who will follow the export
numbers extremely closely. Yes, we expect that US Customs
will be back in Hong Kong (and other jurisdictions) later
this year to carry out production verification visits in
the safeguard categories. Discussions are ongoing between
US Customs and the Hong Kong authorities to renew the customs
cooperation agreement that expired at the end of 2004, which
provided the framework for the production verification visits
and the lists published by US Customs of Hong Kong companies
convicted of origin offenses.
These visits
will lead to detentions, as they have always done in the
past, of goods in the categories under scrutiny. Los Angeles,
as before, will likely be a very active port for detentions.
The message for Hong Kong companies producing goods in categories
under safeguard or expected to go under safeguard is to
have all the production records substantiating Hong Kong
origin on the ready, so that the records can be provided
within a day or two to the US importer in the event there
is a detention. Remember that if the factory does not have
sewing tickets, all is not lost. Look for a comparable record,
such as a daily production log. The factory head can also
issue a declaration explaining the factory’s recordkeeping
system if records, such as sewing tickets, that US Customs
expects to see are not records the factory ordinarily maintains.
Everybody in
Hong Kong knows or should know what the drill is by now.
We have all been through this before. It’s June 2005.
But it sure feels a lot like June 2004. The more things
change, the more they stay the same.