Tradelink-eBiz Tradelink corporate website
Members
Training Courses
What's New
eBiz-Highlights
eBiz Pulse
e-Post
BizCentral
CIECC
TradeAids
Tariffs & Regulations
Trade Info Circular
TradeStat
Labour Legislation
e-Connect

Ad in eBiz

Chinese VersionHome
e-PostBizCentralTradeAids
Search eBiz

 
| Talking Point | Interviews | Success Stories | China Today | Import & Export | Legally Speaking | Regional Development |
Legal issues for acquisition of foreign brands by Hong Kong watch manufacturers
In Issue One 2006 of "Legally Speaking" the writer discussed how the Hong Kong watch industry may, under CEPA III, enjoy zero import tariff on products of Hong Kong origin by either registering a self-developed brand or acquiring a foreign brand through a Hong Kong company. As a continuation of the last article, the writer discusses what legal issues watch manufacturers should consider in the acquisition of the foreign brands.

Under CEPA III, the Hong Kong watch industry may enjoy zero import tariff on products of Hong Kong origin entering into the Mainland market either by registering a self-developed brand or acquiring a foreign brand through a Hong Kong company. "Hong Kong brand" under CEPA III includes both Hong Kong self-developed brands registered under the Trade Mark Ordinance and foreign watch brands acquired by Hong Kong companies. In such circumstances, the acquirer of the foreign watch brand shall first complete the trade mark registration of the brand before the application for certificate of place of origin from the Trade and Industry Department (TID). After completion of the trade mark registration, the applicant should submit the following to TID: (i) Certification of Registration; (ii) Publication of the Acceptance for Registration; and (iii) documents in relation to the acquisition of the foreign brand, such as acquisition contract.

Assuming that the trade mark of the foreign brand has been duly registered outside Hong Kong, there will then be 4 different scenerios, which give rise to different legal implications, in respect of the acquisition of the foreign brand:

  1. The trade mark of the brand is not registered in Hong Kong and the owner of the brand has yet carried on business here in Hong Kong using the brand;
  2. The trade mark of the brand is registered in Hong Kong but the owner of the brand has yet carried on business in Hong Kong using the brand;
  3. The trade mark of the brand is not registered in Hong Kong but the owner of the brand has carried on business in Hong Kong using the brand; or
  4. The trade mark of the brand is registered in Hong Kong and the owner of the brand has carried on business in Hong Kong using the brand.

Firstly, if the trade mark of the foreign brand is not registered in Hong Kong, the acquirer of the brand has to register the trade mark of the foreign brand in Hong Kong. Further, as all trade mark is regional, the acquirer of the brand shall consider the application of trade mark in Mainland China in order to protect the brand from infringement in Mainland China.

Secondly, even if the trade mark of the foreign brand is registered in Hong Kong, the acquirer of the brand shall in accordance with section 29 of the Trade Mark Ordinance register the transfer of the trade mark in Hong Kong Trade Mark Registry within 6 months of the acquisition, failing which the owner of the trade mark will have no right to claim for damages and account for profit from the infringers for the infringement committed before the registration of the transfer of the trade mark.

Apart from the issue of registration of trade mark in Hong Kong, the acquirer of the brand shall also consider whether the original owner of the foreign brand has carried on the business in Hong Kong by the use of the brand. In general, apart from the tangible asset such as "registered trade mark", the transfer of brand also includes the intangible asset such as "goodwill" and other non-registerable intellectual property.

If the acquisition involves the transfer of goodwill, it will be regarded as a transfer of business. According to the Transfer of Businesses (Protection of Creditors) Ordinance, if the transferor has carried on the business in Hong Kong by the use of the brand before the transfer, the transferee shall become liable for the debts and liabilities of the transferor unless the transferee gives a notice of transfer in the Gazette, two Chinese language newspapers and one English language newspaper 1 month before the completion of transfer (but not exceed 4 months before the completion of transfer).

Apart from the above 2 issues, the acquirer shall consider the following legal matters before the negotiation and execution of the assignment of brand:

  1. Apart from trade marks, the transfer and disposal of the following ancillary intellectual property rights may also be dealt with in the acquisition of the foreign brands:
    Copyright - Copyright is non-registerable and there is no legal mechanism for the registration of copyright in the world. In the course of the transfer of trade mark, the transferee shall also consider the transfer of all ancillary copyright such as right of use and original design work.
    Registered - If the transferor has registered the design of the product in association with the subject trade mark, the assignee should consider requesting the transferor to transfer the relevant registered design.
    Patent - If the transferor has registered the patent of the product in association with the subject trade mark, the assignee should consider requesting the transferor to transfer the relevant patent.
  2. The acquirer should conduct due diligence against the trade mark, including the registered status, class(es), specification(s) and any ancillary condition for registration. Further, the acquirer shall check whether the trade mark is subject to any charge or encumbrance and whether there is pending litigation against the trade mark. As the acquisition of the foreign brand involves the application of foreign law, the acquirer should obtain legal opinion of the place of registration of the trade mark.
  3. The acquirer shall demand warranties from the transferor as to the continuity, legality of the trade mark and whether it is encumbrance-free.
  4. The acquirer may consider adding a non-competition clause in the purchase agreement to ensure that the transferor shall not carry on a similar business in Hong Kong or Mainland China in competition with the acquirer's business over a certain period of time.

The above-mentioned issues are by no mean exhaustive. As the agreement for the acquisition of trade marks is by no mean a simple sale and purchase agreement, the transferee shall take legal advice on the execution of such an agreement for the protection of his legal interest and avoidance of potential litigation.

Conclusion

CEPA III lifts the import tariff on the Hong Kong self-developed watch brands which fail to fulfill the original prescribed requirement of 30% extra value originated from Hong Kong. It certainly helps boost up the development of value-added local-made watches with its own intellectual property rights. In fact, there is all along huge demand from Mainland consumers for Hong Kong-made watches. It is important for the Hong Kong watch manufacturers to establish its product image and protect the trade mark of the products apart from quality control.


We hope that this article may serve to remind the watch merchants in Hong Kong to have a better understanding on the legal issues involved in the registration of trade marks and the acquisition of foreign brand, so as to get hold of the new business opportunities brought by CEPA III.

 
June 2006



| Home | About Us | Site Map | Legal Notice | Privacy Policy | Help | Contact Us |
Tradelink Electronic Commerce Limited. All rights reserved.